Rates of Reaction :: GCSE Chemistry Coursework Investigation

Regardless of whether the quality of Hydrochloric corrosive will influence the speed of the pace of response while responding with Magnesium Ribbon. I need to see if the quality of Hydrochloric corrosive will influence the speed of the pace of response while responding with Magnesium Lace. Factors There are two significant free factors in my examination the first is the grouping of the Hydrochloric Acid utilized during the examination. The grouping of the corrosive will somewhat decide how quick the response happens, in the event that we put a portion of the magnesium lace into the HCL at 2molar then it may have essentially broken up inside a couple of moments and afterward I would not have had the opportunity to record down any better than average enough outcomes to plot a chart with. The other significant autonomous variable that will influence the speed of the rate of response is the length of magnesium strip. We have to put enough Mg Ribbon into the HCL so it doesn’t run out straight away yet additionally with the goal that the trial stops without anyone else once the gas syringe has topped off. The purposes behind picking these two free factors are that it would be too difficult to even think about trying and discover an impetus for this investigation; a impetus is a substance that expands the pace of a compound response without being devoured in the response. Finding an impetus for this specific test could take months quit worrying about the measure of time we have been given for our analysis. The autonomous variable that I will change will be the hydrochloric corrosive, we will utilize 50ml of HCL at the accompanying molarity fixations; 2molar, 1.6molar, 1.2molar, 0.8 molar and 0.4 molar. I have chosen to explore different avenues regarding these various qualities of molar since I figure it will give a wide arrangement of results to place into a diagram. The dependant variable I will quantify will be the time it takes for the magnesium to totally respond with the hydrochloric corrosive, I will record the occasions for every centralization of hydrochloric corrosive multiple times so it makes it a reasonable test. To guarantee the examination is reasonable we will utilize a similar length of magnesium strip for all the various qualities of hydrochloric corrosive also, the length will be the one that we selected from the fundamental tests. Another manner by which we will keep the examination reasonable will be to complete a test at every centralization of hydrochloric corrosive multiple times with the goal that we would then be able to get ideally around a similar result from each analysis, and if there are any irregularities we can attempt to clarify why they occurred.

Electoral college Essay

Who’s deciding in favor of the president? Not you. We live in a general public where your vote doesn’t straightforwardly tally during a presidential political race. This is because of an outdated framework called the constituent school. The appointive school (EC) was established in 1787. The establishing fathers set up the framework with the goal that the president is picked in a roundabout way. This was done so that â€Å"popular passion,† wouldn’t factor in so much. Fundamentally they didn’t need presidential battles to turn out to be simply promotion crusades. (outsider occasions) But there are a couple of genuine defects in the discretionary school that should be managed. For instance, the notable Democratic maxim â€Å"one man, one vote,† (which implies each vote checks) doesn’t apply to presidential races in view of the EC. The appointive school makes it feasible for an up-and-comer who wins the mainstream vote of the individuals to lose the administration. (constituent school) This has happened precisely multiple times before. Once in 1876, and once in 1888, and most as of late during the 2000 decisions. President Bush lost the well known vote to competitor Al Gore by more than 500,000 votes. Shrubbery despite everything won the administration since Florida (a key state in decisions) had a very late change in the discretionary votes. This tossed the whole state into a republican vote. â€Å"On two different events (1800 and 1824), the House of Representatives 2 picked the president when no one won an appointive school lion's share. Thomas Jefferson once portrayed this condition as ‘the most risky smear on our Constitution.’ † (appointive school) Lawrence P. Longley and Neal R. Pierce, two specialists on the constituent school and Harvard educators, concur wholeheartedly with Jefferson’s articulation. They realize beyond any doubt the shortcomings of the EC. They did a few figurings to delineate this point further. Californians have more than two fold the amount of casting a ballot control as do individuals in Montana in view of the populace contrasts. Surprisingly more dreadful than that is, if even a couple of votes change in some key states it can change the entire result of a political race. for example the 2000 Florida decisions. There have been 22 razor close decisions in our history one of which was † the 1960 race between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixonâ€if 8,971 votes in Illinois and Missouri had changed from Kennedy to Nixon that year, the outcome would have been an appointive school deadlock.† (discretionary school) Longley and Peirce contend that â€Å"it’s just a short time before it separates totally. The President of the United States is chosen in a roundabout way by the appointive school †an ancient and particular framework that compromises at regular intervals to upset mainstream will.† (constituent school) To finish everything off, the individuals we decide to decide in favor of the president aren’t even required to keep their vows. â€Å"In 24 states and the locale of Columbia, voters are 3 not limited by any state law or guideline that they vote in favor of the states mainstream vote winner.† (community esteems) For instance in 1988 a balloter s wore to Michael Dukakis changed his vow to Lloyd Bentsen. Likewise it occurred in 1976 when a voter promised to Gerald Ford decided in favor of Ronald Reagan. These are only a couple of the cases including â€Å"faithless electors† a term utilized for balloters who change their promise. The inquiry is what do we do about these issues? The appropriate response is straightforward, we change the EC. (urban qualities) There are three essential designs for changing the manner in which the EC works. The first is known as the corresponding technique. This specific choice hasn’t been looked into as much as the others. Fundamentally in the event that an up-and-comer gets 58 percent of the well known vote, at that point they likewise get 58 percent of the constituent vote. This reflects mainstream will and lets the voters keep their occupations. The issue with this technique is that it would require support from each state. (political race change) The second is the arrangement to annul the constituent school totally. This is a basic arr angement which is getting progressively mainstream. If you somehow happened to wipe out the EC it would better mirror the well known vote, dispose of the chance of â€Å"faithless electors,† and it may build voter turnout. (political decision change) In request to dispose of the EC totally you would require 66% of the place of Representatives and the Senate and 38 states to concur that it should be changed. 4 and however abrogating the EC is quick turning into a mainstream thought (particularly since the 2000 races) there is as yet insufficient help for the thought. The unforgiving the truth is that there most likely will never be sufficient help. This is on the grounds that the very individuals who’s employments rely upon the presence of the constituent school are the ones settling on a significant measure of the choice whether to keep it. (city esteems) Luckily there’s an answer. Rather than disposing of the discretionary school simply adjust it a smidgen. The third arrangement is known as the District Method. This could be a decent choice, on the grounds that as opposed to having the whole state swing towards one ideological group for the constituent vote, presently a state could be separated into littler parts . This would better speak to the well known vote and along these lines the individuals. Another explanation that the District Method may work is that you don’t need an established change. Regardless of whether just a couple of states received this strategy it would be compelling. Likewise it’s a decent trade off . The appointive school is still in play, so supporters of it wouldn’t fight. What's more the individuals would have to a greater degree a state in who their leader is . What's more, that’s the main thing. (political decision change) Now you can see that the well known vote, which our nation was established on as a majority rules system , can be defeated to fit the impulses of the discretionary school. Our fundamental privileges of picking the individuals who oversee us don't matter on account of presidential decisions which are the most significant races. This can't stand. At the point when our progenitors composed the constitution, the United States was a lot of 5 littler and the individuals were better spoken to in light of the fact that they were in littler gatherings. That isn’t the case today. Things have changed and we as a general public must change with the occasions. If not, any self selected tyrant could pay or convince oneself into power with possibly unfavorable outcomes. Make the most of your vote. Request to change the appointive school. 6 Work Cited Page â€Å"Electoral College.† Web News: Product surveys. 11/9/2003. Harvard Electoral College Experts. Dec. 2000 http://www.webdesk.com/constituent school/Third Party Times. The Electoral College System. 1992, League of Womens Voters of California Education finance. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu./case/3pt/electoral.html Electionreform.org. 2001. Political race Reform. http://www.electionreform.org.ERMain/needs/ec/reform.htm Civic-Values State Lawmakers Mull Electoral College. Nov.2000. http://civic.net/city values.archive/200011/msg00181.html

What Is Extrinsic Motivation and How Does It Work

What Is Extrinsic Motivation and How Does It Work Theories Behavioral Psychology Print Extrinsic Motivation By Kendra Cherry facebook twitter Kendra Cherry, MS, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. Learn about our editorial policy Kendra Cherry Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on June 12, 2017 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on November 15, 2019 More in Theories Behavioral Psychology Cognitive Psychology Developmental Psychology Personality Psychology Social Psychology Biological Psychology Psychosocial Psychology In This Article Table of Contents Expand What Is Extrinsic Motivation? Extrinsic Motivation Can Involve Tangible or Psychological Rewards How Effective Is Extrinsic Motivation? Extrinsic Motivation Can Sometimes Backfire Best Uses of Extrinsic Motivation View All Back To Top Extrinsic  motivation  refers to behavior that is driven by external rewards such as money, fame, grades, and praise. This type of motivation arises from outside the individual, as opposed to intrinsic motivation, which originates inside of the individual. Verywell / Joshua Seong What Is Extrinsic Motivation? Think about your own motivation for reading this article. Are you trying to learn the material so that you can get a good grade in your  psychology class? This means that you are studying the material to gain external reinforcement (getting a good grade), which means that your behavior is extrinsically motivated. If, on the other hand, you are reading this because you are interested in learning more about human behavior, then that would be an example of intrinsic motivation. People who are extrinsically motivated will continue to perform an action even though the task might not be in and of itself rewarding. Example A person who works in a manufacturing position, for example, might perform a number of routine tasks that are not enjoyable. Because this person is receiving an extrinsic reward (a paycheck) for completing these tasks, he or she will feel motivated to perform them. When you want to get someone to do something, such as getting your kids to do their homework, what is the best way to motivate them? Many people might start by offering some type of reward like a special treat or toy. This is a great example of extrinsic motivation since the behavior is motivated by a desire to gain an external reward. Unlike intrinsic motivation, which arises from within the individual, extrinsic motivation is focused purely on outside rewards. 1:17 Is It Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation? Extrinsic Motivation Can Involve Tangible or Psychological Rewards Extrinsic motivation is usually defined as our tendency to engage in activities in order to gain some type of known, external reward. It is important to note that these rewards can be either tangible or psychological in nature. Money and trophies are two common types of tangible rewards. People engage in activities that they might normally not find terribly enjoyable or rewarding in order to earn a wage. Athletes often engage in strenuous and difficult training sessions in order to be able to compete in sporting events in order to win trophies and awards. Psychological forms of extrinsic motivation can include praise and public acclaim. A child might clean her room in order to receive positive praise from her parents. An actor might perform in a role in order to obtain attention and acclaim from his audience. In both of these examples, while the reward is not physical or tangible, it is a type of motivating reward that is external to the actual process of participating in the event. How Effective Is Extrinsic Motivation? So just how well do extrinsic rewards work for increasing motivation? This type of motivation can be highly effective. Just look at all of the examples in your own life of things that you do in order to gain some type of external reward. You might shop with a store loyalty card in order to gain points, discounts, and prizes. You might toil away performing tasks at work that you dislike in order to keep getting a steady paycheck. You might even use a particular type of credit card in order to receive airline miles. All of these are examples of performing specific behaviors in order to obtain an external reward. Extrinsic Motivation Can Sometimes Backfire While offering rewards can increase motivation in some cases, researchers have also found that this is not always the case. In fact, offering excessive rewards can actually lead to a  decrease  in  intrinsic motivation. The tendency of extrinsic motivation to interfere  with intrinsic motivation  is known as the  overjustification effect. This involves a decrease in intrinsically motivated behaviors after the behavior is extrinsically rewarded and the  reinforcement  is subsequently discontinued. In a classic experiment by Lepper, Greene, Nisbett, children were rewarded lavishly for drawing with felt-tip pens, an activity that they had previously enjoyed doing on their own during play time.?? When the children were later offered the chance to play with the pens during play time, the children who had been rewarded for using them previously showed little interest in playing with the pens again. The kids who had not been rewarded, however, continued to play with the pens. Why would rewarding an already intrinsically rewarding behavior lead to this sudden disinterest? One reason is that people tend to analyze their own motivations for engaging in an activity. Once they have been externally rewarded for performing an action, they assign too much importance to the role of the reinforcement in their behavior. Another possible reason is that activities that initially feel like play or fun can be transformed into work or obligations when tied to an external reward. Extrinsic rewards can be an important tool in motivating behavior, but experts warn that they should be used with caution, especially with children.?? Best Uses of Extrinsic Motivation Extrinsic motivators are best applied in situations where people have little initial interest in performing the activity or in cases where basic skills are lacking, but these rewards should be kept small and should be tied directly to performing a specific behavior.?? Once some intrinsic interest has been generated and some essential skills have been established, the external motivators should be slowly phased out. A Word From Verywell Extrinsic motivation can exert a powerful influence on human behavior, but as research on the overjustification effect shows, it has its limits. You might also find it helpful to consider whether you are intrinsically or extrinsically motivated when engaging in certain activities. Are you looking forward to your workout at the gym because you have a bet with a friend about who can lose the most weight? Then  you are extrinsically motivated. If, on the other hand, you are eager to work out because you find the activity fun and satisfying, then you are intrinsically motivated. Extrinsic motivation is not a bad thing. External rewards can be useful and effective tool for getting people to stay motivated and on task. This can be particularly important when people need to complete something that they find difficult or uninteresting, such as a boring homework assignment or a tedious work-related project.